Over ninety
percent of Americans supported background checks for guns. Despite this
overwhelming support from the public, the senate voted 54-46. It is sad how the divide is so strong between
these two parties. It is also sad how much power the NRA has and these lobbying
groups can essentially buy votes. Ninety percent of Democrats voted for these
measures to be instated while ninety percent of Republicans voted against it
(Washington Post)
I apologize
for this upcoming rant but I cannot understand why people would be against
background checks for someone buying guns. We need to acknowledge that guns are
a problem in our country right now. How can we be so blind to see that if there
is a problem is something it needs fixing. Common sense should prevail, not interest
groups and party divides.
The
problem with the gun issue is that many pro gun advocates have this fear that
the government is out to get them; it seems many have this delusional obsession
with totalitarianism and big brother. The paranoia that their rights are being
stripped away from them when in fact nothing of the sort is happening. They
claim that the right to bare arms is necessary to protect us from the big scary
government coming to get us and take us away. Sorry to break it to you, but if
the government really is coming to get you, you are screwed. Nothing that you
have in that shed that is stocked to the gills, that looks like it is straight
out of a zombie apocalypse movie with any “toy” imaginable wont muster up to
the weapons and technology that the government has. There toys are bigger and
they are stronger. None of that matters though because the government really is
not going to enslave us all. It is ludicrous that this point even has to be
made.
I need
to address the notion that if it can fix the entire problem it is useless. Some
pro gun advocates tend to argue that if a law does not eradicate the problem
then it is worthless and there is no point in having it. Really? Murder is
against the law in every single state. Does
this mean there is no such thing as murder? Of course not, murder still
happens. If the litmus test for passing a law were complete prevention, then it
would be anarchy because we would have no laws. 100% prevention is impossible with any issue.
Laws do
not exist to eliminate crime. That is fantasy and is never possible. Laws exist
in order to reduce the behavior or action that they address and to provide
penalties for
those that break them. Laws conform to norms and human nature.
I do not understand why one would be against a background check if they were not a convicted felon. If you are a felon, you should have to declare that when you buy a gun. Do you have a mental illness associated with violent behavior? If you do not fail these two standards then you would pass a background check and be allowed to purchase a gun. Where is the violation or elimination of your rights? How is insuring the safety of others such a lambasting on your rights?
I do not understand why one would be against a background check if they were not a convicted felon. If you are a felon, you should have to declare that when you buy a gun. Do you have a mental illness associated with violent behavior? If you do not fail these two standards then you would pass a background check and be allowed to purchase a gun. Where is the violation or elimination of your rights? How is insuring the safety of others such a lambasting on your rights?
There are only two logical reasons to oppose universal background checks. First is that you would fail them yourself because of problems in your past. Secondly, is that you have a serious illness where you should not really have a gun in the first place.
Honestly, the bill was only asking for such minimal
background checks that most people would think they would be commonplace in the
first place. The fact that this issue came down to party lines and interest
groups is beyond me. It is common sense. There is clearly a problem with guns
in our country. We have the most gun related deaths out of any nation in the
world. Our nation has just suffered two recent tragedies (Aurora
and Newtown )
and the shooting of a senator just last year. There is clearly a problem. I am
not trying to take your guns away. I am just asking that you pass a reasonable
background check before you purchase a weapon that has the ability to end a
life in mere seconds.
End Rant…..
Sources
2 comments:
I will say guns don't kill people. People do. With that said its should be the common practice to keep guns away from those who do harm. I sadden to add that one of our own senator Kelly Ayotte is one of those who voted against this bill. It weird to me to see this post due to the fact that my mom, older brother, and I just had a discussion about this yesterday morning. In that discussion my mom asked a good question. It was "Where is the constitution does it say a person has the right to bare assult riffles." My response to her was no where and we both doubt the founding fathers when forming the second ammendment had these types of guns in mind. To end I just have to say I'm not against guns just guns getting into the hands of those who shouldn't have them
Though guns don't kill people, I think its fair to say they help...quite a lot, and though background checks will not stop someone from killing another if they really want to, it can help to prevent unstable people from buying them. I am far from against guns, but I am for safety.
Post a Comment