Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Another U.S. conflict? Is the United States a glutton for punishment?

The rebel uprising in Libya has been a roller coaster of ups and downs when it comes to success for either side in the fight for control of the government. The revolt against Colonel Qaddafi has taken a decisive turn in favor of the current regime. This has been the focus of the international community and especially the U.N. The United States has never been good at these situations and quite often makes the situation worse in the long run. The United States has taken a surprising stance in this conflict, being part of a multilateral effort to bring about a peaceful transistion. The Obama administration has let the U.N. com up with a resolution and then abided by it to create a no fly zone to protect libyan citizens. This new twist is refreshing considering the american history involving foreign countries internal affairs and american involvement. America has been directly involved with the overthrow of a multitude of nations at the expense of the people in that country and to the benefit usually of an american corporation. This refreshing feeling about the new american stance was short lived however, debate has begun in Congress about arming the libyan rebels with american weapons to turn the tide of the conflict and overthrow Colonel Qaddafi. This new turn of events is mind boggling, how can this even be up for debate? I personally hope that the rebels overthrow Qaddafi and create a free and fair government for themselves and I am sure I am not the only american with that thought process. This however needs to be accomplished by the Libyan people themselves with no interference from outside nations, especially the United States. Creating the no fly zone evens the odds and reduces the amount of collateral damage that occurs through off course bombs killing innocent civilians. That makes sense, that seems like a responsible direction of take this conflict in. Instead of leaving it at that and for once letting the United States come out of situation without deep seeded hatred from nations all over the world the U.S. opens this pandora's box once again. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said that while the U.S. has not decided to arm the libyan rebels yet it is completely within the United States legal right to do so if they feel the need to. This blatant disreguard for mulitlateral decision making is what creates terrorism. Engaging in this decision would bury the United States in Libya for years. I am at a lost for words if this comes to light. President Obama has allowed CIA agents to collect more information on th rebels and at some point he will make a decision on whether or not to arm the rebels. That decision if it is made to arm the rebels will be another in a long list of bad security decisions that american administrations have made over the years. Let these two groups work out their differences maintain the no fly zone and monitor any civilian harm and respond accordingly. For the life of me I can not understand why the U.S. feels the need to stick its nose in matters that do not affect it. The people of Libya are responsible for Libya. The men and women who defend the United States are responsible to defend against nations that attack us. They are not to be used as international police at the whim on a marginal interest. We as american must love being hated around the world. Lets change that with the right decision in Libya. Citation: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/in-libya-cia-is-gathering-intelligence-on-rebels/2011/03/30/AFLyb25B_story.html http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/world/africa/30diplo.html?ref=todayspaper

3 comments:

Nicole said...

I actually giggled at your title before I even read the blog itself. I'm fairly certain that it's the United States's goal to drive the entire globe to absolutely despise us. This is just another conflict that will shake the distrust of the American people, and will put us further into debt. I understand that these people do in fact need help, but come on, seriously, there's still much to be done in New Orleans, and we don't see the government jumping to pass out help on that one.

I think our best bet would've been to stay out of Libya and all other conflicts, and focus on our own. But wait, that would be logical. =P

jmfarrell said...

I agree the United States should have stayed out of lybia and not act as the "international police".

elmorgani said...

Allowing the U.N. to come up with resolutions is probably the best means to go about this uprising. The resolutions are an embargo on arms to everyone but the rebels, and to enforce the protection of civillians. The problem I have with giving arms to rebels is that they are mostly composed of individuals with no prior training. Regardless of UN approval and U.S. advisories, Libyan rebels are looking to U.A.E to increase oil sales in order to pay for weaponry to take down Qaddafi. Many are saying that we dont know enough about the rebel forces to arm them and I have to agree. I wish that there were other peaceful means to overthrow this government.

For the life of me I cant figure out why the U.S does this either. The interest is the oil and unfortunately we just keep on exploiting countries to get what we want.